Showing posts with label Henry H. Kennedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Henry H. Kennedy. Show all posts

Friday, December 21, 2007

CIA Torture Tapes

Roland Lloyd Parry reports on Agence France-Presse:


US government lawyers flatly denied Friday that videotapes destroyed by the CIA contained any scenes of the torture of Guantanamo Bay terror suspects, in a keenly watched court hearing here.

"It is inconceivable that the destroyed tapes could have been about abuse, mistreatment or torture of detainees at Guantanamo Bay," lawyer Jody Hunt, representing the White House, told the court....

...Hunt said the tapes were made in 2002 and that neither of the two men shown in them "was at Guantanamo Bay during the taping of these videos."

But a lawyer for "war on terror" suspect Moahmaod Abdah, who was not shown in the destroyed tapes, has called for the court to order an investigation into the destruction of the videos.

"Where there is smoke there is fire," lawyer David Remes said....

...The tapes reportedly show the suspects undergoing waterboarding, in which prisoners are subjected to a process of simulated drowning that is widely considered torture.



Since the CIA destroyed the tapes, they can claim any ol' thing they want ... who's gonna tell the devil he's lying? How about telling the devil he's playing word games?

Matt Apuzzo from the Associated Press has this story:

... U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy is considering whether to delve into the matter and, if so, how deeply. The Bush administration is urging him to back off while it investigates.

"Why should the court not permit the Department of Justice to do just that?" Kennedy asked at a court hearing....

...Government lawyer Joseph Hunt said the joint Justice Department-CIA investigation into the destruction of the videos will also seek evidence of whether the government violated any court orders. Hunt promised the judge that, when the investigation is complete, lawyers will tell the court if its rules were violated.

"It would be unwise and imprudent" for the judge to investigate further, Hunt said.The judge had ordered the government not to destroy any evidence of mistreatment or abuse at the Navy base in Cuba. Because the two suspects — Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri — were being held overseas in secret CIA prisons, however, they are likely not covered by the order....

..."The Justice Department may have sanctioned the destruction of these videotapes," attorney David Remes said. "Now they are asking the court to stay out, on the ground it is investigating the destruction of these videotapes."...



Thursday, December 20, 2007

Torture Tape Destruction - Violation of Court Order?

Richard B. Schmitt of the Los Angeles Times (repost on CommonDreams) has the latest on the evolving case of the CIA's destruction of the torture tapes:

Over the objections of the Justice Department, a federal judge said Tuesday he would explore whether the U.S. had violated a court order to preserve evidence when the CIA destroyed videotaped interrogations of two terrorism suspects in 2005.


U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy Jr. set a hearing for Friday in Washington in response to a request from Yemeni prisoners who are challenging their detention by the U.S. at the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba....

...The tapes were destroyed by a CIA official in November 2005, at a time of growing congressional and public concern about U.S. tactics in the war on terrorism, including interrogation techniques.

It was also five months after Kennedy, in the case of the Yemeni prisoners, issued an order requiring that the U.S. preserve and maintain “all evidence and information regarding the torture, mistreatment and abuse of detainees now” at Guantanamo Bay....

...Destroying evidence relevant to a legislative or judicial proceeding could constitute obstruction of justice....

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer Editorial Board remarks:

... On Wednesday, The New York Times reported a story (the White House has consistently refused to comment), telling us that no fewer than four of President Bush's lawyers (including Lawyer of the Year Alberto Gonzales) were in on the talks on what to do with the tapes.

Yet, we're expected to trust the Justice Department to
investigate itself even as it asks Congress to back off plans for an immediate hearing. We agree with Georgetown law professor Jonathan Turley, who says he's "seen more reputable conduct from mob attorneys." There's no way Congress should postpone a hearing.